Gos rl's progress

[ImBrokz]

I think those who were using Gos Rl before the EAC update would like to hear how you're progressing with the update. 🙏

[kevz88100]

Time is long without gos 

[Feretorix]

Well we have the injector, but @Heisa has to make sure he will be releasing features slowly making sure they are undetected since we're internal...

[REZZ]

Is it possible to switch private? I think it poses a high risk if everyone has access - especially now with eac

[Feretorix]

5 minutes ago, REZZ said:

Is it possible to switch private? I think it poses a high risk if everyone has access - especially now with eac

Yes it might be possible to switch private and maybe slot limited. I just can't think of the correct way to do this yet, except provide access to everybody who "lost it" during 29th April.

[Godly]

1 hour ago, Feretorix said:

Yes it might be possible to switch private and maybe slot limited. I just can't think of the correct way to do this yet, except provide access to everybody who "lost it" during 29th April.

that sounds confusing lmao , but i also feel private is the way to go

 

[muraioshino]

Another idea instead of strict slot limits could be some kind of progressive access system.

For example, people affected on April 29th could regain access first, then others could slowly be added over time depending on activity and stability. You could also remove inactive users automatically after a while, which would naturally free up space without needing hard slot limits.

A whitelist or invite-based system could work well too, especially if access is given manually at first. That way things stay controlled, but it still feels fair and flexible for everyone involved.

I think something like this would probably feel more natural to the community than a strict “limited slots” message. 😊

 

[ImBrokz]

Thanks for sharing, @Feretorix. I'm really looking forward to it—I've been using Gos RL for two years now.

[interstellar]

Member of GOS since 2020, learnt the game throughout those years so I'm pretty good without it. So not so fussed about it being released quickly lol

[Rodrighinni]

13 hours ago, muraioshino said:

Another idea instead of strict slot limits could be some kind of progressive access system.

For example, people affected on April 29th could regain access first, then others could slowly be added over time depending on activity and stability. You could also remove inactive users automatically after a while, which would naturally free up space without needing hard slot limits.

A whitelist or invite-based system could work well too, especially if access is given manually at first. That way things stay controlled, but it still feels fair and flexible for everyone involved.

I think something like this would probably feel more natural to the community than a strict “limited slots” message. 😊

 

This is the best option imo!

[chimpfn]

3 hours ago, Rodrighinni said:

This is the best option imo!

I think it should be how long you have been using GOS because my sub ran out the day the site went down so i havent been able to rebuy it lol

[calvdos]

19 hours ago, Feretorix said:

Yes it might be possible to switch private and maybe slot limited. I just can't think of the correct way to do this yet, except provide access to everybody who "lost it" during 29th April.

Please Feretorix 😄 IF u gonna make it private please make me in.. I was using GoS from 2020 I guess. Im big fan for the GoS RL ❤️

[Arslan]

I had 2 users in the previous forum of GOS, how can they track my last subscription so that I can redeem the remaining days lol.

[sicolasnarkozy]

Same for me here @Feretorix and @Aristo , If u gonna make it private please make me in too. On GOS since 2020

Edited May 14 by sicolasnarkozy

[rnrico13]

been here for some years dont forget about me pls

[Geo]

I've been here for a couple of years and had an active sub during the eac implementation. Hopefully we can help test something soon!

[Revelamos]

Same for me dont forget about me pls too

[jeeeko]

Hoping things are going well so far! It will be an honor to get back into it. Always great to see how GOS was great as is, and now with a complete overhaul this could make this into something better.

[jeeeko]

18 hours ago, Arslan said:

I had 2 users in the previous forum of GOS, how can they track my last subscription so that I can redeem the remaining days lol.

I believe they have records from the previous subs still, I still have my payments to Arista from 2020 or 2021 I forget.

[surgeh4x]

On 5/13/2026 at 12:39 PM, Feretorix said:

Yes it might be possible to switch private and maybe slot limited. I just can't think of the correct way to do this yet, except provide access to everybody who "lost it" during 29th April.

just my idea being around providers for a variety of games, grandfather those of us in, and do a invite system where as long as we have a active sub every "x" IMO 6-12 months each user who has maintained a active sub gets a invite code. Keeps it private and adds value to the exclusiveness. And only give a new code to the user if the last one has been redeemed. Iv been a part of GoS sense 2016 and i know whatever yall decide with be amazing. 

[Glari]

On 5/13/2026 at 9:39 PM, Feretorix said:

Yes it might be possible to switch private and maybe slot limited. I just can't think of the correct way to do this yet, except provide access to everybody who "lost it" during 29th April.

Yeah, I think an invite-only private version sounds justified, keeps the driver usage low, so it's harder to detect, but also makes it easier to maintain since there are fewer users on the driver.

[Chloe]

On 5/16/2026 at 6:28 PM, Glari said:

Yeah, I think an invite-only private version sounds justified, keeps the driver usage low, so it's harder to detect, but also makes it easier to maintain since there are fewer users on the driver.

Contrary to popular belief, does not help prevent detectability at all. It's the same idea as security through secrecy, but all in all it doesn't make a single difference to it

[Glari]

8 minutes ago, Chloe said:

Contrary to popular belief, does not help prevent detectability at all. It's the same idea as security through secrecy, but all in all it doesn't make a single difference to it

Saying it “doesn’t make a single difference at all” is objectively false.

Private distribution absolutely can affect detectability indirectly because anti-cheats need exposure, telemetry, samples, reports, or analysis opportunities to classify and fingerprint something good enough to be sure it is a cheat.

A driver used by 10 trusted people:

• generates less telemetry,

• creates fewer ban correlations,

• leaks less often,

• is less likely to get dumped/shared,

• gives anti-cheats fewer machines to analyse,

• slows signature generation and heuristic training.

That does NOT mean private = undetectable.
But pretending distribution size has zero impact on real-world detection timelines ignores how anti-cheat intelligence gathering actually works.

Security through obscurity alone is weak, yes. But reduced exposure is still an operational advantage. Those are two different concepts. 😄

[Rodrighinni]

Tbh if GoS realeased just visual stuff like ball prediction and stuff like that I would already be satisfied. I know that automated stuff is harder, but the ESP ones are probably easier and very helpful!

[Shishio]

2 hours ago, Glari said:

Saying it “doesn’t make a single difference at all” is objectively false.

Private distribution absolutely can affect detectability indirectly because anti-cheats need exposure, telemetry, samples, reports, or analysis opportunities to classify and fingerprint something good enough to be sure it is a cheat.

A driver used by 10 trusted people:

• generates less telemetry,

• creates fewer ban correlations,

• leaks less often,

• is less likely to get dumped/shared,

• gives anti-cheats fewer machines to analyse,

• slows signature generation and heuristic training.

That does NOT mean private = undetectable.
But pretending distribution size has zero impact on real-world detection timelines ignores how anti-cheat intelligence gathering actually works.

Security through obscurity alone is weak, yes. But reduced exposure is still an operational advantage. Those are two different concepts. 😄

I dont think that GoS will have only 10 RL users, even if its private. But your points are kinda valid. EAC (other ACs as well) do know if a user has a manual mapped driver running or not (or mapped .dll), they just dont care if only a few people have that (like 3-4 people, not over 10) and if they notice that more and more people have the same driver running in private memory then EAC will ban them all in the next ban wave. There are many ways to dump a manually mapped driver and its even more easy if the cheat is internal. My point is, making it private doesnt change anything about the detection, EAC probably detects it but doesnt do anything and then we all think we are undetected. If u wanna be for real undetected then make the driver/mapper/cleaner,... perfect, in that way the anti-cheat doesnt see anything and GoS could still have over 200 users if they wanted to. Its a difficult topic to explain but as I said, ur points are valid especially "That does NOT mean private = undetectable.".